The Mormon Tattoo & Piercing Controversy
For many years tattoos and decorative piercings weren't a real issue
for members of the Mormon Church. Until the year 2000, there was only
one reference to tattooing in all of Mormon teaching and that was in the
1965 unofficial personal publication Mormon Doctrine by Mormon Apostle,
Bruce R. McConkie. It states; "Tattooing is a desecration of the human
body and should not be permitted, unless all that is involved is the
placing of a blood type or an identification number in an obscure place.
Latter-day Saint servicemen in particular are counseled to avoid the
pitfalls of tattooing. Persons who are tattooed are not, however, denied
the ordinances and blessings of the temple."
In the October 2000
General Conference the first of many "councils" against tattooing was
announced.
"We--the First Presidency and the Council of the
Twelve--have taken the position, and I quote, that "the Church
discourages tattoos. It also discourages the piercing of the body for
other than medical purposes, although it takes no position on the
minimal piercing of the ears by women for one pair of earrings."
President Gordon B. Hinckley
At the time my husband and I were
very active, temple recommend holding members of the church and had been
operating a tattoo studio without any prejudice for many years. We were
never treated poorly or shunned by the members of our Ward or Stake.
Our Stake President's wife more than once brought her children to our
studio to get tattoos. It was such a non issue that one of the ways I
billed myself in advertising was Kita Kazoo the Mormon Girl Tattoo
Artist.
Since then we both have been subjected to many discussions
and debates on the right or wrong of getting and doing tattoos and
piercings. At first I would defend my choice of profession using the
scriptures, but eventually I got tired of it and began asking those who
questioned me to explain to me, what horrible thing would happen in our
society if everyone had a tattoo? After all, sins are those things that
violate the golden rule and keep us from loving one another, not things
such as, what clothing we wear or how we do our hair.
Now, 8 years
later the whole subject of tattoos and piercings has in my opinion
gotten out of hand. Now it is not so surprising to find that the local
church authorities, such as bishops, stake presidents and temple
presidents are taking it upon themselves to punish members who choose to
get a tattoo. Not just in Utah, but all over the world. This has become
such a big issue that people are leaving the church over it.
Some
people who have tattoos are told not to take the sacrament and others
are not allowed access to the temple. Some are being counseled to not
marry those who have tattoos and piercings. As having been a 30+ year
student of Mormonism and its history I feel that this behavior is not in
line with the teachings of Mormonism or Christianity in any way.
Mormons
aren't the only religion that superstitiously believes that tattoos are
an evil and to be avoided as they supposedly will lead to worse sins.
Many Christian Churches and Jewish Rabbi's do also. And there are good
reasons for a religion to not want their flock to get tattoos or
piercings.
Getting a tattoo not only changes the way you look but
it also changes the way you think and feel about yourself. It is a clear
message that you feel that you are the owner of your body and worse of
all (to religious leaders), your mind!
Historically tattoos have
been used as an expression of faith and commitment. One would think that
getting a symbol of your beliefs tattooed on ones self would be
encouraged. However, because of the recent history of American tattooing
and the popularizations of tattooing, tattoos are being presented by
the media and politicians as a dangerous amusement. It is not new for
counter-culture decorations to be viewed as repulsive to many of the
elders of our society.
When I heard at General Conference that
President Gordon Hinckley (the current Mormon Church President) does not
like tattoos and some piercings I was not surprised. The tattoos he has
been exposed to in his youth were usually not very well done or
artistic. Unlike today, tattooed people of his generation, especially in
socially backwards Utah may have appeared attractive only to criminals
or rough military men, not average everyday people with families and
lives of good account.
To further the injury of one's personal
opinion of fashion being stated as if it is a law from God, President
Hinckley allows for one sort of permanent decorative change to ones
appearance and not another, which seems hypocritical to me. Mr. Hinckley
allows within the church for women to have their faces tattooed with
permanent cosmetics and wear pierced earrings, (but one pair only - one
in each ear) as those are socially acceptable with in his peer group.
I
feel that these religious leaders are ignorant of tattoo history as a
spiritual practice and generally trivialize tattoos and piercings as
immoral and frivolous behaviors of rebellion because they do not want
their followers to look like everyone else. It is a power game and
nothing more. If they can control the way you look they will control the
way you think and feel.
I suspect that the shunning of persons
with tattoos and piercings is really a part of the whole elitist thought
pattern of Mormonism in Utah. Those who have not done their homework
are sure to believe that if you look like a Gentile (any non-Mormon) you
will act like a Gentile, which means to Mormons that you are without
God and are basically led by the Devil.
However it has been my
experience that tattoos do not lead to sin. Being uninformed and willing
to blindly follow without question is what leads to sin and personal
disgrace.
If you are LDS and still considering a tattoo you should
first be asking yourself these questions. Does my tattoo choice reflect
my beliefs or will they distract from my message of who I am. Am I
getting tattooed because I want to immortalize an event in my life, a
belief or to rebel against the mainstream culture? Will this tattoo or
piercing prevent me from being a good person? The answers to these
questions will let you know if you are doing the right thing or reacting
poorly to your society. It is my opinion that if you feel having a
tattoo would be a healthy positive thing for you, then by all means
exercise your own good judgment and free agency and get one.
Keep
in mind that in reality "Tattooings are not only ornaments...they are
not only emblems of nobility and symbols of rank in the social
hierarchy: they are also messages fraught with spiritual and moral
significance...not only to imprint a drawing onto the flesh but also to
stamp onto the mind all the traditions and philosophy of the group."-
Claude Lévi Strauss
Personally I believe that tattoos in and of
themselves can not be evil and I don't believe that God cares one way or
another if you have one or not, unless you got that tattoo to alienate
and hurt other people. Then the real problem is how you feel towards
your fellow men and not the tattoo in itself.
People have a right
to decorate themselves how they want to. Some people like to put
pictures on their bodies and some people don't. It is all a matter of
personal taste. I feel it is wrong to subject my taste on others and I
expect the same courteousness in return.
This attitude is healthy
and normal. This is how it is in the big world where the Mormon
lifestyle is not practiced by the majority. Wouldn't the world be great
place if we could all mind our own lives and appreciate the good things
out there instead of picking on others for being different?
You
can do good or evil with everything on this earth. As a heavily tattooed
person I have had many more opportunities to love and serve others
through tattooing and having tattoos than before I had them. I have had
to become more patient and tolerant. Especially have I had to learn to
be more patient and tolerant with those who claim to be "spiritual
leaders" as they put words in God's mouth rather than follow what they
claim God has already spoken.
I have found that most people who
have tattoos are more open and friendly towards others. I have found
that for the most part people who wear tattoos are very nice people.
There are a few people that I have met to whom their tattoos serve more
as warning to stay away than an invitation to meet them. Which I feel is
also a good thing as it has saved me a lot of time by helping me to
avoid an unpleasant interaction with them.
Most people have their
personal spiritual philosophy tattooed on them and it becomes a way of
opening the opportunity to speak about spiritual things. In this world
where we are taught to be afraid of our neighbors it is nice to have a
way of really getting to know the people around you. It is nice to have a
common bond despite all other social differences.
If you already
have a tattoo and are experiencing social rejection issues it is wise
remember that things in the church change quickly. I would not be
surprised to find that in 20 years having a tattoo won't be an issue at
all. The evil music that was preached against in the 60's and 70's is
now played regularly at church dances and the Coke and Pepsi drinkers
that were denied temple recommends in the 1970's can now go to the
temple in spite of their soda habits. It is all a matter of generational
perspective, which is bound to change as the old guys finally die off.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/1693826